| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i7-3770


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the i7-3770 gets 130.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.8 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2012

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
12222 (-2.21%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
11925 (-37.41%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
4455 (-5.65%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
4833 (-53.07%)
TOTAL
46570
33434 (-28.21%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
48201 (-35.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
55687 (-56.14%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
21481 (-32.37%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
5174 (107.19%)
TOTAL
235799
130543 (-44.64%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
626 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
723 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
279 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
1695 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
3134 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
3058 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1142 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
1239 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
8573 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9