| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i7-1065G7


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.4 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
28194 (28.16%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
22133 (10.79%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
10320 (126.02%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
14171 (25.34%)
TOTAL
57847
74818 (29.34%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
86387 (-36.80%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
86216 (-36.26%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
32992 (0.72%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
8747 (252.98%)
TOTAL
307175
214342 (-30.22%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9