| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i7-10610U


Description
Both models i5-10400T and i7-10610U are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i7-10610U gets 160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.9 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2020

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
26939 (22.46%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
24942 (24.86%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
5344 (17.04%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
11689 (3.38%)
TOTAL
57847
68914 (19.13%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
69813 (-48.93%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
68277 (-49.52%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
15478 (-52.75%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
7178 (189.66%)
TOTAL
307175
160746 (-47.67%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
2793 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
619 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
6430 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5498 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5090 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1091 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2385 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
14064 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9