Core i5-10400T vs i5-520M
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-520M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the i5-520M gets 26.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 8.7 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the i5-520M gets 26.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 8.7 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
20655
Core
Comet Lake-S
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
FC-PGA 988
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
13.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
26.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
5.41k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
3.69k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
2.12k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
1.88k (x0.17)
TOTAL
46.19k
13.1k (x0.28)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
10.7k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
7.91k (x0.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
5.08k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
2.58k (x1.02)
TOTAL
229.42k
26.27k (x0.11)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
226 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
145 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
751 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
1844 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
641 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
4466 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4