Core i5-10400T vs i5-8265U
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806eb
Core
Comet Lake-S
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
24.32k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
20.35k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.38k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
8.52k (x0.75)
TOTAL
57.85k
57.57k (x1)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
65.17k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
63.6k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
14.4k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
6.31k (x2.55)
TOTAL
307.18k
149.48k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4