Core i5-10400T vs i5-7200U
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 101.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 101.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2016
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
3155 (-21.22%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
12853 (-9.42%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
4144 (-10.30%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
5212 (-52.75%)
TOTAL
33842
25362 (-25.06%)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
6279 (-72.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
29268 (-69.70%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
9306 (-70.60%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
4705 (91.96%)
TOTAL
153456
49558 (-67.71%)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
11389 (-9.69%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
16470 (-8.20%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
4359 (-9.72%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
5209 (-51.82%)
TOTAL
46191
37426 (-18.98%)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
23574 (-68.41%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
37398 (-68.74%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
10149 (-68.91%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
4780 (89.68%)
TOTAL
229416
75901 (-66.92%)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
11364 (-9.07%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
17265 (-9.39%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
4029 (-14.68%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
4766 (-53.72%)
TOTAL
46570
37422 (-19.64%)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
24082 (-67.71%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
41228 (-67.53%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
10187 (-67.93%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
4721 (89.07%)
TOTAL
235799
80219 (-65.98%)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
20298 (-7.73%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
18318 (-8.30%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
4294 (-5.95%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
4334 (-61.66%)
TOTAL
57847
47245 (-18.33%)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
44580 (-67.39%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
43050 (-68.17%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
10054 (-69.31%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
3954 (59.57%)
TOTAL
307175
101638 (-66.91%)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
2972 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2870 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
670 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
6776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6548 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1385 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1398 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
15240 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9