Core i5-10400T vs i5-5675R
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
40671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Bradwell-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
194.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
4.14k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
14.35k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
4.94k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
5.47k (x0.5)
TOTAL
33.84k
28.91k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
16.02k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
54.6k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
18.69k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
16.87k (x6.88)
TOTAL
153.46k
106.18k (x0.69)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
12.86k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
16.85k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.19k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
5.49k (x0.51)
TOTAL
46.19k
40.39k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
50.07k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
64.61k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
19.84k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
17.09k (x6.78)
TOTAL
229.42k
151.6k (x0.66)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
12.88k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
18.27k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.12k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
5.45k (x0.53)
TOTAL
46.57k
41.72k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
49.91k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
70.3k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
19.69k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
16.92k (x6.78)
TOTAL
235.8k
156.83k (x0.67)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
21.91k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
18.59k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
5.2k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
5.72k (x0.51)
TOTAL
57.85k
51.43k (x0.89)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
84.92k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
72.09k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
20.13k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
17.07k (x6.89)
TOTAL
307.18k
194.2k (x0.63)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
2988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4