Core i5-10400T vs i5-4590
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4590 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-4590 gets 126.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.4 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-4590 gets 126.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.4 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
Jun 2014
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
20708 (-5.87%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
11056 (-44.65%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
4679 (2.48%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
3950 (-65.06%)
TOTAL
57847
40393 (-30.17%)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
69613 (-49.07%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
36747 (-72.83%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
15653 (-52.21%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
4589 (85.18%)
TOTAL
307175
126602 (-58.79%)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
186 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
1507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5597 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
2988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1265 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1068 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
10917 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9