| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i5-4570


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4570 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-4570 gets 161.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.9 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2013

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
4164 (3.99%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
10328 (-27.21%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
4736 (2.52%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
4334 (-60.70%)
TOTAL
33842
23561 (-30.38%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
16505 (-27.51%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
41120 (-57.43%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
18706 (-40.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
7433 (203.25%)
TOTAL
153456
83763 (-45.42%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
12823 (1.69%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
11399 (-36.47%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
5034 (4.26%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
4270 (-60.51%)
TOTAL
46191
33525 (-27.42%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
50804 (-31.91%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
45218 (-62.20%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
19844 (-39.21%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
4847 (92.36%)
TOTAL
229416
120713 (-47.38%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
13135 (5.10%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
12023 (-36.90%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
4996 (5.80%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
4651 (-54.84%)
TOTAL
46570
34803 (-25.27%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
49747 (-33.30%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
45717 (-63.99%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
19929 (-37.26%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
9046 (262.28%)
TOTAL
235799
124440 (-47.23%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
21721 (-1.26%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
12268 (-38.59%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
5033 (10.22%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
4541 (-59.83%)
TOTAL
57847
43564 (-24.69%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
85746 (-37.27%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
48711 (-63.99%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
20079 (-38.70%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
7071 (185.33%)
TOTAL
307175
161607 (-47.39%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1021 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
580 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
239 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
1924 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3408 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1398 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1261 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
12101 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9