| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i5-4460


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4460 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-4460 gets 140.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.2 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
39.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
140.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
12.12k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
10.69k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.71k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
3.87k (x0.38)
TOTAL
46.57k
31.39k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
45.75k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
42.71k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
17.81k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
6.08k (x2.44)
TOTAL
235.8k
112.35k (x0.48)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
19.84k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
10.86k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.46k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
4.39k (x0.39)
TOTAL
57.85k
39.53k (x0.68)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
75.08k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
42.36k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
16.38k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
6.45k (x2.6)
TOTAL
307.18k
140.27k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
894 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
504 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
195 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
1670 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5834 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
11628 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4