| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs I5-4460


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the I5-4460 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the I5-4460 gets 112.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.1 times faster than the I5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2014

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
I5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
12119 (-3.03%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
10687 (-43.91%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
4710 (-0.24%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
3872 (-62.40%)
TOTAL
46570
31389 (-32.60%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

I5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
45747 (-38.66%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
42707 (-66.36%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
17814 (-43.91%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
6083 (143.58%)
TOTAL
235799
112351 (-52.35%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
I5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
545 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
1338 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
I5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
3565 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
3143 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1385 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
9232 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9