| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i5-2467M


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-2467M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the i5-2467M gets 29.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.9 times faster than the i5-2467M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
Jun 2011

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
5397 (-56.82%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
4896 (-74.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
2397 (-49.24%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
2087 (-79.74%)
TOTAL
46570
14776 (-68.27%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
11667 (-84.36%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
10741 (-91.54%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
5086 (-83.99%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
2285 (-8.50%)
TOTAL
235799
29778 (-87.37%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
686 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
632 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
1752 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
2347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1042 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
907 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
6424 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9