Core i5-10400T vs i5-2320
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.5 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.5 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
66.48k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
8.88k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
7.84k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
3.79k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
3.51k (x0.34)
TOTAL
46.57k
24.01k (x0.52)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
27.98k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
24.48k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
11.42k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
2.6k (x1.04)
TOTAL
235.8k
66.48k (x0.28)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
295 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
258 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
700 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
2689 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
2375 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
1063 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
7277 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4