Core i5-10400T vs i5-1038NG7
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
23.2k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
21.2k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
9.4k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
11.54k (x1.02)
TOTAL
57.85k
65.35k (x1.13)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
94.68k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
103.38k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
35.79k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
9.33k (x3.76)
TOTAL
307.18k
243.18k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
8685 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4