| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i5-1038NG7


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2020

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
23204 (5.48%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
21205 (6.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
9398 (105.84%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
11541 (2.07%)
TOTAL
57847
65348 (12.97%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
94680 (-30.73%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
103376 (-23.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
35792 (9.27%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
9330 (276.48%)
TOTAL
307175
243178 (-20.83%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9