| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 214.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
3876 (-3.20%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
14979 (5.56%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
9699 (109.96%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
8599 (-22.03%)
TOTAL
33842
37153 (9.78%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
14612 (-35.82%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
54898 (-43.16%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
27578 (-12.87%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
5044 (105.81%)
TOTAL
153456
102132 (-33.45%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
12888 (2.20%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
18551 (3.40%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
9934 (105.75%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
9539 (-11.77%)
TOTAL
46191
50912 (10.22%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
50059 (-32.91%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
66100 (-44.75%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
20239 (-38.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
5514 (118.84%)
TOTAL
229416
141913 (-38.14%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
13578 (8.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
19526 (2.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
9372 (98.48%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
9227 (-10.39%)
TOTAL
46570
51703 (11.02%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
56252 (-24.58%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
73733 (-41.92%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
29564 (-6.92%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
5395 (116.04%)
TOTAL
235799
164944 (-30.05%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
26084 (18.57%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
19613 (-1.82%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
9603 (110.32%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
9118 (-19.35%)
TOTAL
57847
64418 (11.36%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
95658 (-30.02%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
81695 (-39.60%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
31677 (-3.29%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
5059 (104.16%)
TOTAL
307175
214089 (-30.30%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
6377 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
5446 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
2112 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
337 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
14273 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
7246 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5448 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2533 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
17894 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9