Core i5-10400T vs i3-8350K
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
906eb
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
237.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
27.29k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
24.19k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
5.75k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
11.13k (x0.98)
TOTAL
57.85k
68.36k (x1.18)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
107.78k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
95.93k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
22.65k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
11.26k (x4.54)
TOTAL
307.18k
237.63k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
2611 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4