Core i5-10400T vs i3-8145U
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.1 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.1 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806eb
Core
Comet Lake-S
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
34.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
75.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
17.78k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
12.8k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
2.61k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
1.3k (x0.11)
TOTAL
57.85k
34.48k (x0.6)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
28.06k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
34.83k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
9.69k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
2.55k (x1.03)
TOTAL
307.18k
75.13k (x0.24)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
5008 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
4558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3281 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
669 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
332 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
8840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4