| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i3-8130U


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.5 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2018

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
21092 (-4.12%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
19407 (-2.85%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
4047 (-11.36%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
2799 (-75.24%)
TOTAL
57847
47345 (-18.16%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
38229 (-72.03%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
38894 (-71.24%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
8754 (-73.27%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
2470 (-0.31%)
TOTAL
307175
88347 (-71.24%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
5890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9