| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Celeron N3150


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the N3150 gets 32.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.1 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
406c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Braswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
kB
Date
April 2020
March 2015

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
1073 (-73.21%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
1739 (-87.74%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
1503 (-67.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
1460 (-86.76%)
TOTAL
33842
5776 (-82.93%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
3985 (-82.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
6310 (-93.47%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
5050 (-84.04%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
2653 (8.25%)
TOTAL
153456
17999 (-88.27%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
3904 (-69.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
2291 (-87.23%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
1579 (-67.30%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
1465 (-86.45%)
TOTAL
46191
9239 (-80.00%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
14886 (-80.05%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
8727 (-92.71%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
5922 (-81.86%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
2745 (8.94%)
TOTAL
229416
32280 (-85.93%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
2481 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
1455 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
458 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
5380 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
1877 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
4442 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9