| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 5.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2020
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
2.34k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
6.54k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
3k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
2.74k (x0.25)
TOTAL
33.84k
14.62k (x0.43)

Multithread

i5-10400T

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
4.67k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
12.66k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
5.95k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
2.53k (x1.03)
TOTAL
153.46k
25.8k (x0.17)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
7.87k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
7.14k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
3.04k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
2.79k (x0.26)
TOTAL
46.19k
20.84k (x0.45)

Multithread

i5-10400T

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
15.12k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
14.05k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
5.94k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.48k (x1.38)
TOTAL
229.42k
38.59k (x0.17)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4