| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 5.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2020
December 2012

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
2343 (-41.47%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
6537 (-53.93%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
3002 (-35.02%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
2738 (-75.17%)
TOTAL
33842
14620 (-56.80%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
4666 (-79.51%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
12658 (-86.89%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
5950 (-81.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
2526 (3.04%)
TOTAL
153456
25799 (-83.19%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
7873 (-37.57%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
7135 (-60.23%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
3043 (-36.97%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
2786 (-74.23%)
TOTAL
46191
20837 (-54.89%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
15118 (-79.74%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
14052 (-88.25%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
5938 (-81.81%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
3481 (38.15%)
TOTAL
229416
38589 (-83.18%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9