| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2.3 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806d0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
4.4k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
20.25k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
11.69k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
11.66k (x1.06)
TOTAL
33.84k
48.01k (x1.42)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
38.93k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
191.89k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
108.8k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
14.95k (x6.1)
TOTAL
153.46k
354.57k (x2.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
15.22k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
25.2k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
12.66k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
11.66k (x1.08)
TOTAL
46.19k
64.74k (x1.4)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
155.37k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
260.27k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
115.37k (x3.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
20.04k (x7.95)
TOTAL
229.42k
551.04k (x2.4)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
17.25k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
25.53k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
12.56k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
11.4k (x1.11)
TOTAL
46.57k
66.74k (x1.43)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
144.5k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
243.41k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
109.02k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
16k (x6.41)
TOTAL
235.8k
512.94k (x2.18)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
30.84k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
26.38k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
12.66k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
11.74k (x1.04)
TOTAL
57.85k
81.62k (x1.41)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
294.86k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
280.92k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
113.9k (x3.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
20.16k (x8.14)
TOTAL
307.18k
709.85k (x2.31)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4