| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 7 4800HS


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2020

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
16656 (-24.29%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
26014 (30.22%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
9308 (103.85%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
9145 (-19.11%)
TOTAL
57847
61123 (5.66%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
144477 (5.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
192459 (42.29%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
83171 (153.91%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
7506 (202.91%)
TOTAL
307175
427613 (39.21%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
12218 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9