| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.8 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
3782 (-5.55%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
16421 (15.73%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
4748 (2.78%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
5511 (-50.03%)
TOTAL
33842
30462 (-9.99%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
15181 (-33.32%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
74870 (-22.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
27846 (-12.03%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
6077 (147.94%)
TOTAL
153456
123974 (-19.21%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
13718 (-37.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
22930 (14.79%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
4991 (9.30%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
5267 (-53.42%)
TOTAL
57847
46906 (-18.91%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
50542 (-63.02%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
93328 (-31.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
25248 (-22.92%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
6067 (144.83%)
TOTAL
307175
175184 (-42.97%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9