| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
12497 (0.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
22920 (20.30%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
5452 (15.45%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
14723 (42.98%)
TOTAL
46570
55592 (19.37%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
92514 (24.05%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
144762 (14.02%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
54429 (71.36%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
22078 (784.16%)
TOTAL
235799
313783 (33.07%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
13723 (-37.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
22479 (12.53%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
5123 (12.19%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
15440 (36.56%)
TOTAL
57847
56764 (-1.87%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
110919 (-18.85%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
200559 (48.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
54243 (65.60%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
7005 (182.68%)
TOTAL
307175
372726 (21.34%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9