Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 5600X
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
435.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
23.28k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
25.58k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
11.72k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
25.45k (x2.25)
TOTAL
57.85k
86.03k (x1.49)
Multithread
i5-10400T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
135.28k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
180.56k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
80.27k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
38.94k (x15.71)
TOTAL
307.18k
435.05k (x1.42)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
6693 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4