| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 5600X


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 5600X gets 438.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
23741 (7.92%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
25867 (29.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
12002 (162.86%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
26106 (130.90%)
TOTAL
57847
87716 (51.63%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
138564 (1.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
184417 (36.35%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
82754 (152.64%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
32863 (1,226.14%)
TOTAL
307175
438598 (42.78%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
2132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2837 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1273 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
6748 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5161 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5623 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2609 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
19069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9