| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 5500


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5500 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
80.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
373.05k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
15.32k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
22.98k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
9.3k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
21.19k (x2.06)
TOTAL
46.57k
68.8k (x1.48)

Multithread

i5-10400T

5500
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
80.25k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
163.59k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
72.83k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
7.34k (x2.94)
TOTAL
235.8k
324.01k (x1.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
22.09k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
24.59k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
10.94k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
22.89k (x2.02)
TOTAL
57.85k
80.52k (x1.39)

Multithread

i5-10400T

5500
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
124.44k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
167.06k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
74.34k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
7.2k (x2.91)
TOTAL
307.18k
373.05k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1144 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
5739 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5261 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5855 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
5451 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
19170 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4