Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
4.2k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
17.36k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
7.5k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
23.79k (x2.16)
TOTAL
33.84k
52.85k (x1.56)
Multithread
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
22.11k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
108.04k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
56.81k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
36.39k (x14.85)
TOTAL
153.46k
223.36k (x1.46)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
15.38k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
21.94k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
7.97k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
24.76k (x2.29)
TOTAL
46.19k
70.05k (x1.52)
Multithread
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
96.91k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
135.12k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
70.39k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
56.43k (x22.39)
TOTAL
229.42k
358.85k (x1.56)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
15.04k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
20.95k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
8.57k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
21.71k (x2.11)
TOTAL
46.57k
66.27k (x1.42)
Multithread
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
94.36k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
141.73k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
69.38k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
32.72k (x13.1)
TOTAL
235.8k
338.19k (x1.43)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
16.04k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
24.47k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
8.38k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
21.66k (x1.92)
TOTAL
57.85k
70.55k (x1.22)
Multithread
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
113.63k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
143.55k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
63.84k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
27.34k (x11.03)
TOTAL
307.18k
348.35k (x1.13)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4