| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 3400G


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 3400G gets 218.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.4 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
14382 (-34.63%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
24867 (24.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
5700 (24.83%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
6591 (-41.71%)
TOTAL
57847
51539 (-10.91%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
63698 (-53.40%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
116432 (-13.92%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
31416 (-4.09%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
7069 (185.24%)
TOTAL
307175
218614 (-28.83%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
980 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1791 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
483 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3363 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3424 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1569 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
12271 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9