| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
3800 (-5.10%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
17383 (22.51%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
5170 (11.92%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
3164 (-71.31%)
TOTAL
33842
29517 (-12.78%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
15275 (-32.91%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
76437 (-20.86%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
27476 (-13.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
3015 (23.02%)
TOTAL
153456
122203 (-20.37%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
13950 (10.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
20702 (15.39%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
5331 (10.41%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
3026 (-72.01%)
TOTAL
46191
43009 (-6.89%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
58562 (-21.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
92948 (-22.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
28553 (-12.53%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
2975 (18.07%)
TOTAL
229416
183039 (-20.22%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
13039 (4.34%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
22350 (17.30%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
5366 (13.64%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
3398 (-67.00%)
TOTAL
46570
44153 (-5.19%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
56494 (-24.25%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
100740 (-20.65%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
28212 (-11.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
3041 (21.76%)
TOTAL
235799
188486 (-20.06%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
14200 (-35.45%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
23234 (16.30%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
5352 (17.21%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
5176 (-54.22%)
TOTAL
57847
47961 (-17.09%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
58236 (-57.39%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
105716 (-21.84%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
28732 (-12.29%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
5587 (125.45%)
TOTAL
307175
198270 (-35.45%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9