Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
3.8k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
17.38k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
5.17k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
3.16k (x0.29)
TOTAL
33.84k
29.52k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
15.28k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
76.44k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
27.48k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
3.02k (x1.23)
TOTAL
153.46k
122.2k (x0.8)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
13.95k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
20.7k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.33k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
3.03k (x0.28)
TOTAL
46.19k
43.01k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
58.56k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
92.95k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
28.55k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
2.98k (x1.18)
TOTAL
229.42k
183.04k (x0.8)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
13.04k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
22.35k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.37k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
3.4k (x0.33)
TOTAL
46.57k
44.15k (x0.95)
Multithread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
56.49k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
100.74k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
28.21k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
3.04k (x1.22)
TOTAL
235.8k
188.49k (x0.8)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
14.2k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
23.23k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
5.35k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
5.18k (x0.46)
TOTAL
57.85k
47.96k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
58.24k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
105.72k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
28.73k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
5.59k (x2.25)
TOTAL
307.18k
198.27k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4