Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.1 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.1 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
13.67k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
22.28k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.99k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
15.22k (x1.35)
TOTAL
57.85k
56.16k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-10400T
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
81.03k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
145.84k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
39.14k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
6.79k (x2.74)
TOTAL
307.18k
272.8k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4