| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 2200U gets 74.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
2626 (-34.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
7841 (-44.74%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
3626 (-21.52%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
2928 (-73.45%)
TOTAL
33842
17021 (-49.71%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
5767 (-74.67%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
24153 (-74.99%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
9277 (-70.69%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
2829 (15.43%)
TOTAL
153456
42025 (-72.61%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
11671 (-7.45%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
14019 (-21.86%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
4526 (-6.25%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
2927 (-72.92%)
TOTAL
46191
33144 (-28.25%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
20487 (-72.54%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
31317 (-73.82%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
9991 (-69.40%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
3030 (20.23%)
TOTAL
229416
64825 (-71.74%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
11538 (-7.67%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
19691 (3.35%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
4552 (-3.60%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
3250 (-68.44%)
TOTAL
46570
39032 (-16.19%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
19251 (-74.19%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
36272 (-71.43%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
10201 (-67.88%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
3072 (23.03%)
TOTAL
235799
68796 (-70.82%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
12394 (-43.66%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
20540 (2.82%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
4362 (-4.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
3076 (-72.80%)
TOTAL
57847
40371 (-30.21%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
20971 (-84.66%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
38770 (-71.34%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
12020 (-63.30%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
3132 (26.40%)
TOTAL
307175
74894 (-75.62%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1398 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2585 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
801 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
4993 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3645 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
6041 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
11874 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9