| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
71.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
2.63k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
7.84k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
3.63k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
2.93k (x0.27)
TOTAL
33.84k
17.02k (x0.5)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
5.77k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
24.15k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
9.28k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
2.83k (x1.15)
TOTAL
153.46k
42.02k (x0.27)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
11.67k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
14.02k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.53k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
2.93k (x0.27)
TOTAL
46.19k
33.14k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
20.49k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
31.32k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
9.99k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.03k (x1.2)
TOTAL
229.42k
64.82k (x0.28)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
11.54k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
19.69k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.55k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
3.25k (x0.32)
TOTAL
46.57k
39.03k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
19.25k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
36.27k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
10.2k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
3.07k (x1.23)
TOTAL
235.8k
68.8k (x0.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
10.73k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
18.15k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
3.99k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
3.89k (x0.34)
TOTAL
57.85k
36.77k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-10400T

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
20.11k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
36.87k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
10.74k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
3.31k (x1.33)
TOTAL
307.18k
71.02k (x0.23)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
4735 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4