| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs FX 9590


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the 9590 gets 138.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.7 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vishera
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
35 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2013

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
11409 (-8.71%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
9527 (-50.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
4139 (-12.35%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
7042 (-31.61%)
TOTAL
46570
32116 (-31.04%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

9590
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
55978 (-24.94%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
52233 (-58.86%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
26935 (-15.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
3184 (27.52%)
TOTAL
235799
138330 (-41.34%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
237 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
14 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
629 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
2282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
1905 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
828 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
6423 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9