Core i5-10400T vs FX 9590
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.7 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.7 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vishera
Base frecuency
2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
35 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
11.51k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
9.57k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.19k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
7.14k (x0.69)
TOTAL
46.57k
32.41k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-10400T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
55.13k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
51.69k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
27.02k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
3.81k (x1.53)
TOTAL
235.8k
137.65k (x0.58)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4