Core i5-10400T vs FX 8120
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 8120 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the 8120 gets 70.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.3 times faster than the 8120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the 8120 gets 70.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.3 times faster than the 8120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
600f12
Core
Comet Lake-S
Zambezi
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
35 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+8x16 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
23.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
70.78k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
9.31k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
6.85k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
2.77k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
4.58k (x0.44)
TOTAL
46.57k
23.5k (x0.5)
Multithread
i5-10400T
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
25.84k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
28.49k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
13.84k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
2.61k (x1.05)
TOTAL
235.8k
70.78k (x0.3)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
207 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
566 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
2327 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
1712 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
693 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4