| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Athlon 3000G


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2019

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
13016 (-40.83%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
20557 (2.90%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
4808 (5.31%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
5434 (-51.93%)
TOTAL
57847
43816 (-24.26%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
27286 (-80.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
49370 (-63.50%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
13571 (-58.57%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
5612 (126.46%)
TOTAL
307175
95839 (-68.80%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
2738 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9