| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs A9 9425


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9425 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 9425 gets 45.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 6.8 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
670f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2018

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
10842 (-50.71%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
14059 (-29.62%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
3221 (-29.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
2226 (-80.31%)
TOTAL
57847
30348 (-47.54%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

9425
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
18461 (-86.49%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
18813 (-86.09%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
5560 (-83.03%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
2222 (-10.35%)
TOTAL
307175
45055 (-85.33%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1231 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
371 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3004 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
2930 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3800 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
602 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
8202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9