Core i5-10400T vs A9 9425
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9425 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.4 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.4 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
670f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
41.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
11.23k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
14.7k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
3.15k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
2.24k (x0.2)
TOTAL
57.85k
31.31k (x0.54)
Multithread
i5-10400T
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
16.58k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
17.84k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
5.09k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
2.23k (x0.9)
TOTAL
307.18k
41.73k (x0.14)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
2782 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
605 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
8461 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4