| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs A6 9210


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 8.7 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
670f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2020
Jun 2016

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
4871 (-61.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
10380 (-42.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
2589 (-46.38%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
2383 (-77.96%)
TOTAL
46191
20223 (-56.22%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

9210
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
7407 (-90.07%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
11873 (-90.08%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
3351 (-89.74%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
2602 (3.27%)
TOTAL
229416
25233 (-89.00%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
4711 (-62.30%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
11027 (-42.13%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
2594 (-45.06%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
2445 (-76.25%)
TOTAL
46570
20777 (-55.39%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

9210
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
8427 (-88.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
12799 (-89.92%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
3317 (-89.56%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
2586 (3.54%)
TOTAL
235799
27129 (-88.49%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
1809 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9