| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs A4 6300B


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 6300B is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 8.6 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
610f31
Core
Comet Lake-S
Richland
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
kB
Date
April 2020
December 2013

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
8347 (-33.21%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
7306 (-61.65%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
2947 (-37.58%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
1510 (-85.33%)
TOTAL
46570
20111 (-56.82%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
10880 (-85.41%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
10011 (-92.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
5020 (-84.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
1625 (-34.92%)
TOTAL
235799
27536 (-88.32%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
167 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
154 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
77 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
2140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
1873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
756 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
387 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
5157 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9