| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i3-13100F


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
b06f5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
47.14k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
25.77k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
13.25k (x2.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
14.77k (x1.31)
TOTAL
57.85k
100.94k (x1.74)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
168.51k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
142.8k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
63.57k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
15.34k (x6.19)
TOTAL
307.18k
390.23k (x1.27)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4