Core i5-10400T vs i7-1165G7
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
210.4k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
4.26k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
19.54k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
10.95k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
11.08k (x1)
TOTAL
33.84k
45.84k (x1.35)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
15.69k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
68.3k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
33.66k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
12.16k (x4.96)
TOTAL
153.46k
129.81k (x0.85)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
14.48k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
24.18k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
11.95k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
11.01k (x1.02)
TOTAL
46.19k
61.62k (x1.33)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
50.98k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
80.7k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
36.61k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
12.02k (x4.77)
TOTAL
229.42k
180.32k (x0.79)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
16.27k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
25.74k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
11.5k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
10.82k (x1.05)
TOTAL
46.57k
64.32k (x1.38)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
54k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
88.76k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
35.23k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
12.14k (x4.86)
TOTAL
235.8k
190.12k (x0.81)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
22.97k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
21.61k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
8.99k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
8.52k (x0.75)
TOTAL
57.85k
62.1k (x1.07)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
82.75k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
86.58k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
29.34k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
11.72k (x4.73)
TOTAL
307.18k
210.4k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
7514 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4