| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 251.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
4473 (11.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
19993 (40.90%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
11397 (146.71%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
11379 (3.18%)
TOTAL
33842
47242 (39.60%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
15964 (-29.88%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
69853 (-27.68%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
35340 (11.65%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
12876 (425.33%)
TOTAL
153456
134033 (-12.66%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
14848 (17.75%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
24892 (38.74%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
12563 (160.21%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
11366 (5.13%)
TOTAL
46191
63670 (37.84%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
51906 (-30.44%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
81324 (-32.02%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
36927 (13.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
12728 (405.13%)
TOTAL
229416
182886 (-20.28%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
16712 (33.72%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
26358 (38.34%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
12091 (156.06%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
11243 (9.18%)
TOTAL
46570
66404 (42.59%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
55780 (-25.21%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
90717 (-28.55%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
35181 (10.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
13025 (421.62%)
TOTAL
235799
194704 (-17.43%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
30834 (40.16%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
27277 (36.54%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
12409 (171.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
11580 (2.43%)
TOTAL
57847
82100 (41.92%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
96355 (-29.51%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
105006 (-22.36%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
37007 (12.98%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
12815 (417.13%)
TOTAL
307175
251183 (-18.23%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
3750 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1322 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
458 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
8971 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6560 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5804 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2640 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2464 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
17468 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9