Core i5-10400F vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
72.25k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.78k points
343.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
28.39k
20.99k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
24.89k
11.9k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
4.72k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.19k
3.75k (x0.28)
TOTAL
72.25k
41.36k (x0.57)
Multithread
i5-10400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
172.62k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
163.51k
110.03k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.6k
44.06k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.48k
16.93k (x2.61)
TOTAL
390.78k
343.64k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
6012 points/W
2545 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6603 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5788 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
16803 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4