Core i5-10400F vs i3-10105
Description
Both models i5-10400F and i3-10105 are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.25k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.78k points
253.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
28.39k
28.9k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
24.89k
25.85k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.88k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.19k
8.29k (x0.63)
TOTAL
72.25k
68.92k (x0.95)
Multithread
i5-10400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
111.69k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
163.51k
110.23k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.6k
28.45k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.48k
3.56k (x0.55)
TOTAL
390.78k
253.93k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
6012 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6603 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5788 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16803 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4