Core i5-10400F vs Engineering Sample 90671
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 90671 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the 90671 gets 878.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 90671 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the 90671 gets 878.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 90671 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
90671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
-/24
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
- kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
- kB
Date
May 2020
-
Mean monothread perf.
72.25k points
78.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.78k points
878.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
90671
Test#1 (Integers)
28.39k
35.2k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
24.89k
25.12k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
9.42k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.19k
8.39k (x0.64)
TOTAL
72.25k
78.13k (x1.08)
Multithread
i5-10400F
90671
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
391.05k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
163.51k
331.85k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.6k
139.66k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.48k
16.02k (x2.47)
TOTAL
390.78k
878.58k (x2.25)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
90671
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/W