Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
72.25k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.78k points
291.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.39k
13.76k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
24.89k
23.03k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.12k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.19k
15.23k (x1.15)
TOTAL
72.25k
57.13k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-10400F
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
83.23k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
163.51k
161.06k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.6k
40.52k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.48k
6.73k (x1.04)
TOTAL
390.78k
291.53k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
6012 points/W
4485 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6603 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5788 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
16803 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4