Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
72.25k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.78k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.39k
14.08k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
24.89k
22.56k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.19k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.19k
16.71k (x1.27)
TOTAL
72.25k
58.53k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-10400F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
86.62k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
163.51k
168.1k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.6k
43.51k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.48k
5.16k (x0.8)
TOTAL
390.78k
303.4k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
6012 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6603 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5788 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
16803 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4