| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i7-12700KF


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-12700KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the i7-12700KF gets 1018.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700KF is 2.6 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
90672
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/20
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1280/2048 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
25600 kB
Date
May 2020
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.25k points
111.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.78k points
1018.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-12700KF
Test#1 (Integers)
28.39k
53.63k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
24.89k
29.55k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
15.21k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.19k
12.88k (x0.98)
TOTAL
72.25k
111.27k (x1.54)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-12700KF
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
465.61k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
163.51k
367.26k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.6k
164.92k (x4.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.48k
20.52k (x3.17)
TOTAL
390.78k
1018.31k (x2.61)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i7-12700KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/W
3725 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/W
2938 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
1319 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
6012 points/W
8146 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i7-12700KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6603 points/GHz
10726 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5788 points/GHz
5910 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
3041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
2577 points/GHz
TOTAL
16803 points/GHz
22255 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4