Core i5-10400F vs N100
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 4.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 4.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
b06e0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
15.23k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
11.04k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.54k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
4.98k (x0.38)
TOTAL
68.14k
36.79k (x0.54)
Multithread
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
37.07k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
32.57k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
14.75k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
3.9k (x0.52)
TOTAL
369.97k
88.29k (x0.24)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4