| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i7-3770K


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-3770K is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 137.8 k points while the i7-3770K gets 97.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.4 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
36.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
133.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
3.86k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
10.79k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
4.9k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
5.51k (x0.44)
TOTAL
38.72k
25.06k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
17.17k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
46.25k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
23.67k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
10.36k (x0.75)
TOTAL
137.82k
97.44k (x0.71)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
278 points/W
223 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1218 points/W
601 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
412 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
212 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
2120 points/W
1265 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
1000 points/GHz
990 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3852 points/GHz
2768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1256 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2933 points/GHz
1412 points/GHz
TOTAL
9005 points/GHz
6426 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4