Core i5-10400F vs i5-10400F
Description
Both models i5-10400F and i5-10400F are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0655
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
28.39k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
24.89k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.78k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
13.19k (x1.02)
TOTAL
68.14k
72.25k (x1.06)
Multithread
i5-10400F
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
180.2k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
163.51k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
40.6k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
6.48k (x0.86)
TOTAL
369.97k
390.78k (x1.06)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4