Core i5-10400F vs i5-1038NG7
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
23.2k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
21.2k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
9.4k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
11.54k (x0.89)
TOTAL
68.14k
65.35k (x0.96)
Multithread
i5-10400F
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
94.68k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
103.38k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
35.79k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
9.33k (x1.23)
TOTAL
369.97k
243.18k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
8685 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4