| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806d0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
4.4k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
20.25k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
11.69k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
11.66k (x0.92)
TOTAL
38.72k
48.01k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
38.93k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
191.89k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
108.8k (x4.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
14.95k (x1.08)
TOTAL
137.82k
354.57k (x2.57)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
30.84k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
26.38k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
12.66k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
11.74k (x0.91)
TOTAL
68.14k
81.62k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
294.86k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
280.92k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
113.9k (x2.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
20.16k (x2.67)
TOTAL
369.97k
709.85k (x1.92)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4