Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
3.89k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
17.94k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
5.34k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
6.62k (x0.52)
TOTAL
38.72k
33.79k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-10400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
15.07k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
66.84k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
19.56k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
6.54k (x0.47)
TOTAL
137.82k
108.01k (x0.78)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
14.48k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
23.84k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.43k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
5.46k (x0.42)
TOTAL
68.14k
49.21k (x0.72)
Multithread
i5-10400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
54.39k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
88.77k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
20.04k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
5.48k (x0.72)
TOTAL
369.97k
168.69k (x0.46)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4